To: js1138
This is getting weird. I thought we were discussing evolution but that does get boring, so let's talk about serial killers instead. Are serial killers evidence of survival of the fittest?
145 posted on
05/12/2006 1:24:15 PM PDT by
mlc9852
To: mlc9852
Are serial killers evidence of survival of the fittest?
No, however your question is evidence that you have decided to change the subject when you saw that your position was being rather soundly disproven.
150 posted on
05/12/2006 1:25:34 PM PDT by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: mlc9852
I thought we were discussing evolutionYou didn't need to get involved. Someone else dropped the excrement in the fan. If you want to argue that evolution causes immoral behavior, I'll keep shoving it back in your face. There's lots more.
155 posted on
05/12/2006 1:28:09 PM PDT by
js1138
To: mlc9852
Are serial killers evidence of survival of the fittest? No.
220 posted on
05/12/2006 2:15:57 PM PDT by
Coyoteman
(Stupidity is the only universal capital crime; the sentence is death--Heinlein)
To: mlc9852
I thought we were discussing evolution but that does get boring In the same way watching a sport for which you don't know the rules can get boring.
Are serial killers evidence of survival of the fittest?
No. Are they evidence of intelligent design? If so, what does that say about the designer?
1,086 posted on
05/15/2006 11:07:12 AM PDT by
LibertarianSchmoe
("...yeah, but, that's different!" - mating call of the North American Ten-Toed Hypocrite)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson