Convenient memory lapse on your part. Scroll back to my reply 137 where I quoted from the majority opinion in the Legal Tender Cases. The Supreme Court ruled that paper currency was not a violation of the Constitution, and it was the first of many decisions since then that have all upheld the Constitutionality of paper currency. And it the end that is all the evidence I need to provide. And how did you respond? With the typical southron whine that the court was biased. Well boo freakin' hoo. You can provide quotes from Blackstone, Jefferson or Bullwinkle the Moose for all the difference it makes. The fact that you believe paper currency to be a violation of the Constitution is meaningless. The court has ruled on the subject and unless the Constitution is amended or the case is overturned by a future court then get used to dollar bills.
free dixie,sw