[2nsdammit]

http://www.americanscientist.org/template/IssueTOC/issue/346

The first article discusses the speciation. The link below, (although long, sorry!) is a reprint. There is ample evidence to support the common ancestor theory; although I am sure that since the process took a while, you will deny that it happened, since no humans "observed" it.

http://chiron.valdosta.edu/jbpascar/Courses/Biol1010/ExtraCreditActivities/American%20Scientist%20Online%20-%20Adaptive%20Radiation%20of%20Darwin's%20Finches.htm

[connectthedots]

From the first link:In one model of how species form, geographical separation leads to evolutionary divergence. Recent evidence permits refinement of this model.

I've always said that evolution is not a theory; it is a model. No proof of evoulution there.

As for the second linked page, it 'cannot be found', just like proof for evolution.

[connectthedots]

From the first link:In one model of how species form, geographical separation leads to evolutionary divergence. Recent evidence permits refinement of this model.

I've always said that evolution is not a theory; it is a model. No proof of evoulution there.

As for the second linked page, it 'cannot be found', just like proof for evolution.