Sorry. You parse words and ask us what "is" is. I cited your source himself.
Read him without your "change for change's sake" goggles on.
Furthermore, I have a long, distant history of dealing with such issues on this board, and have shown repeatedly by the writings of the evols themselves, how so much of evolution's arguments amount to nothing more than silly, circular, semantic games.
Do a search and you'll see that your position - along with those of your cohort here - has already been more than adequately addressed and refuted.
Buh-bye.
OK, Stingray, Buh-bye.