[calex59]

This was a fake study. The moths were pinned on the trees for the photos taken and did NOT rest on either light or dark areas per se. Just another fake evolution theory that was totally rigged, and this is a fact you can check if you want to. Most evos know it was fake by now and like to sweep it under the rug, it is embarassing for them to mention it.

[CarolinaGuitarman]

"This was a fake study."

Not at all.

"The moths were pinned on the trees for the photos taken and did NOT rest on either light or dark areas per se."

Not true. There were one or two photos that had both color patterns side by side that had the birds pinned down, because it is hard enough to find the moth let alone both color varieties together. It was simply used as an illustration of the two color varieties. ALL of the other pictures were of ONE moth that was photographed undisturbed on the tree trunks. The study was in no way faked and this charge has been refuted time and time again.

"Most evos know it was fake by now and like to sweep it under the rug, it is embarassing for them to mention it."

What's embarrassing is how anti-evos, who ostensibly attack evolution because it is supposed to lead to immorality, have no trouble lying through their teeth about what this study showed.

[ahayes]

Oh, it's you again.

And once again you're completely wrong.

[RobRoy]

"Most evos know it was fake by now and like to sweep it under the rug, it is embarassing for them to mention it."
So it's sort of one of those "Piltdown man" thangs? 8^>