To: AndrewC
"I contend that Darwinism is also non-falsifiable."
Then you must also contend that there exists no evidence that can possibly go against it. You have already said that such evidence exists but has been ignored; therefore, your contention that evolution is unfalsifiable cannot be true, if this alleged evidence really does exist. You can't have it both ways.
Basic logic. Try it sometime.
880 posted on
05/02/2006 6:50:59 PM PDT by
CarolinaGuitarman
("There is grandeur in this view of life....")
To: CarolinaGuitarman
Then you must also contend that there exists no evidence that can possibly go against it.Nope. I can contend that evidence against it is suppressed so as to make Darwinism non-falsifiable. O.J. Simpson is a free man.
884 posted on
05/02/2006 6:53:38 PM PDT by
AndrewC
(Darwinian logic -- It is just-so if it is just-so)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson