Yes and the evos will always ignore the point when it is scored and merely move to some other, equally invalid claim such that it is merely one long, never-ending argument and you have to prove them wrong at each and every point or they will claim victory.
Never mind that you have repeated shown them to be liars.
That's just how the game is played.
I mostly engage in it so that like-minded people can benefit from my sources and experience to strengthen their witness. There's no 'proof' around this, only assumptions and inferences. There is nothing technically inferior about the YEC position. It all rests on belief, on both sides.
Once you realize that, you don't have to fear the ridicule of these people any more. That is really their only weapon and we know about 'weapons'.
Give one "point scored" on this thread which is remotely scientific which was not countered with a rational, scientific answer, or the bebunking as a hoax.
"I mostly engage in it so that like-minded people can benefit from my sources and experience to strengthen their witness. "
I've definitely been enjoying the discussion on this thread, especially the parts about dating. Thanks for your input.
It's amazing to me how science has gotten so corrupted these days to the point that supposition equates to reproducible data. Your comment "Experimental facts' are *only* valid for the time period covered by the experiments" seems absolutely obvious but is quite an affront to many scientists with their wild extrapolations. And the more you point this out, the more irate they become in their insistence that they only deal with the facts.