Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Coyoteman
You evolutionists date the rocks by the fossils found in them and date the fossils by what rocks they are found in.

What kind of data are you looking for.

Science is looking at what you find and analyzing it not pounding it into your world view.
35 posted on 05/01/2006 9:02:46 AM PDT by BillT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: BillT
You evolutionists date the rocks by the fossils found in them and date the fossils by what rocks they are found in.

Nice try. But aren't you forgeting several different kinds of radiometric dating, as well as paleomagnetic and other recent methods of dating?

Slipped your mind?

38 posted on 05/01/2006 9:05:47 AM PDT by Coyoteman (Tagline change in progress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: BillT
You evolutionists date the rocks by the fossils found in them and date the fossils by what rocks they are found in.

You creationists are fos. Rock formation age is determined directly or indirectly by radiometric means.

670 posted on 05/02/2006 1:03:36 PM PDT by edsheppa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: BillT; Coyoteman
You evolutionists date the rocks by the fossils found in them and date the fossils by what rocks they are found in.

That is a falsehood. Look up the facts of radiometric dating, stratiography, tree-ring timelines, etc...

And do not repeat that false assertion again: Your first use of it can be excused as an innocent error of ignorance. No subsequent reiteration of it will be.

762 posted on 05/02/2006 2:31:22 PM PDT by King Prout (many complain I am overly literal... this would not be a problem if fewer people were under-precise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson