Defining evolution in those terms is indistinguishable from a created, adaptive biology.
Haven't you ever wondered why 'evolution' must be described in terms that are indistinguishable from a created biology? Maybe so that you can reconcile the reality to the theory?
Fact is, there is no *evidence* that is inconsistent with a created, adaptive biology; only *interpretations* of evidence.
And there never will be. Because *anything* is compatable with a "created biology". That's one of the reasons it's not science - there's no way to test it.