What is your point? To not allow any opposition to TOE? LOL
Can you actually read or did you purposely ignore the second paragraph of my post? Does "LOL" stand for "Lots of laughs" or "Lack of Language". Gee... what does the first sentence of my second paragraph say? Let's take a look at my post shall we? It says:
"Now you know what... if a scientist actually proposed a theory that was different from Evolution but explained what we see in the fossil record and what we see today that is perfectly fine."
I clearly state that opposition to Evolution is something I am ok with, as long as it was a "better scientific explanation". Yet... you seem to think I said the opposite. What a funny person you are. We could start our own Vaudeville show where I say something and you think it is the opposite.
Now whatever orifice you pulled that "To not allow any opposition to TOE?" idea from I don't want to know. Just put it back there, ok?