Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: maggief

I can't remember when it was first mentioned...

I do know that if Kim is spinning this date rape drug theory, then she has to have a rational explaination of why the guys didn't drug her, also. Other than the fact that she's fugly.

I don't think she's smart enough to figure out that she could have just said that she declined the offer of a drink.....


112 posted on 04/24/2006 9:22:39 AM PDT by Jrabbit (Scuse me??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]


To: Jrabbit

This drink story is pretty early, so that means we have to go back something like 2 weeks or so to find it. Someone is probably looking for it now.


123 posted on 04/24/2006 9:27:46 AM PDT by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]

To: Jrabbit

A DUI would certainly violate Kim's parole.

The Kroger's guard smelled alcohol on Kim. The police should have, too. They thought Crystal was drunk. Wouldn't they give Kim a sobriety test before letting her drive off? Did she drive off?


131 posted on 04/24/2006 9:30:39 AM PDT by maggief (And the dessert cart rolls on ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]

To: Jrabbit

One would think the search warrant would call out booze, drinking glasses, drug containers and the like if Kim had told the drug story to the police early on.

They did find some sort of drug container, but they were not searching for it when they wrote out the warrant.


185 posted on 04/24/2006 9:53:13 AM PDT by clearvision
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson