Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: CarolinaGuitarman
Regarding man vs corn do your own homework and study nucleotides. In a 100,000 strand one nucletide difference makes a huge difference. Much less a 1% difference. A one percent difference makes a huge gap between species.

Here is a fun site that talks about how scientists at Howard Hughes University are studying the possibility that life started in clay. Seems to me they are finally beginning to look in the right place.You know, "the dust from the earth", in Genesis.

http://www.astrobio.net/news/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=655&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0

Just as astrophysics and evolution are slowly beginning to be studied together in some instances, so should ID and evolution and physics. As time passes I suspect at least two of the sciences to merge. Depends on whether ID is left out or not, if it's three. I wonder how much time could be saved using Genesis as the template?

I like science and think the study of evolution is necessary, as well as the study of physics, all the sciences, especially the science of the Bible.

778 posted on 04/22/2006 4:21:20 PM PDT by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 770 | View Replies ]


To: MissAmericanPie

"Regarding man vs corn do your own homework and study nucleotides."

Sorry, you're not even close to being correct. Humans and corn are not 3% different genetically. It's more like 33%. Just admit you made a mistake. Be an adult about it.

"Just as astrophysics and evolution are slowly beginning to be studied together in some instances, so should ID and evolution and physics."

But ID isn't science. It's central claim, the designer, is untestable as are the designer's alleged actions. ID is an old philosophical claim that was dropped by scientists about 150 years ago.

"I wonder how much time could be saved using Genesis as the template?"

None. Genesis was a horrible dead end for science.

"I like science and think the study of evolution is necessary, as well as the study of physics, all the sciences, especially the science of the Bible."

The Bible is not a science text. The less that a scientist relies on the Bible for their work, the better.


781 posted on 04/22/2006 4:29:40 PM PDT by CarolinaGuitarman ("There is grandeur in this view of life....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 778 | View Replies ]

To: MissAmericanPie

Just as astrophysics and evolution are slowly beginning to be studied together in some instances, so should ID and evolution and physics. As time passes I suspect at least two of the sciences to merge. Depends on whether ID is left out or not, if it's three. I wonder how much time could be saved using Genesis as the template?

Astrophysics, evolution, ID, and physics? And at least two of these sciences will merge? Genesis as a template to save time?

In which is your expertise?.

783 posted on 04/22/2006 4:36:24 PM PDT by ml1954
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 778 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson