[CarolinaGuitarman]

"Rather than seeking a definition, which is readily available, I have asked them to state the "Theory of Evolution"."

And we asked you first to back up your silly claim that evolution is too *broad* to be a scientific theory.

You have studiously avoided doing so. Instead, you throw insults at anybody who has the audacity to actually request you back up your claims.

Pretty pathetic.

[RunningWolf]

Well this guy attacking you is definitely no scientist.

He infers he might be a historian, but I doubt even that, certainly not a professional or published historian.

On this post, (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1617533/posts?page=908#908) Old Landmarks noticed I have an uncanny grasp of the obvious LOL.

Well here is another uncanny grasp of the obvious. These people (at least this one) are not about debate. Talk past him and to the lurkers. That is who counts, not the cultist nutball with the evo-crackerjack credentials. His taunts carry about as much weight too.

Wolf