Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Golden Eagle
Obviously because you chose Stallman's clone of Unix over bonafide Unix like Solaris for Intel.

What's a "bonafide Unix"? How far back do you have to go? Which branch is legit? Is BSD legit? Was SunOS legit? Is MINIX legit? Do we just call all of Unix a bastardized MULTICS? Do we call Windows XP a bastardized VMS? Or do we just recognize that all operating systems have their roots somewhere else?

58 posted on 04/11/2006 8:52:38 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: antiRepublicrat
What's a "bonafide Unix"?

Something pretty unrelated to Stallman, since he specifically refers to his commie clones as "GNU's NOT Unix". And you've never have explained why you can't just use Unix, instead of Stallman's commie clones. You tried by saying they weren't free, which of course was a lie.

63 posted on 04/11/2006 9:56:56 AM PDT by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson