your statement, dodger, was that NOT ONE SCIENTIST of his age EVER accepted his theory.
since then, you have backed off somewhat, saying "awww, shucks, he had his supporters and all, but..."
no "buts" about it, dodger.
Man up, admit your error, and promise to not do it again. You can cross your fingers behind your back, but I want your recantation on-record and absent of equivocation.
"his age" ~ he was born in 1880. His book on Continental Drift was published (in Deutsche) in 1915. He would have been 35 at the time. By the time 1960 came around, he was 80. The normal lifespan for a man of his time was far less.