"the FIRST peer reviewed journal article concerning plate tectonics" could have appeared yesterday, and I would be perfectly comfortable.
moreover, "the FIRST peer reviewed journal article concerning plate tectonics" could have appeared yesterday, and your doubled-absolute statement would *still* be false.
just admit it - you made a gross overstatement.
just pledge to attempt to avoid doing it again.
then I might interested in seeing your posts.
until then, well... trading barbs with artful dodgers doesn't appeal to me.
so, again: good day.
Up until the publication of that particular study, it was mere conjecture. After the publication, it became accepted doctrine.
(NOTE: Nothing like being there at the foundations ~ remember, the past is not like the present ~ it really is stranger than you can imagine, unless you remember it.)