[Dimensio]

to make the remark that humans did evolve from something similar sounds like it is wishful thinking that he, a human, likes the idea of being a creation evolved from a fishlike creature, instead of being created by a loving God in His likeness...

I do not understand how anyone could reach such a conclusion. It certainly does not appear to be a logical derivation from the original statement. The statement that humans evolved from "something similar" is a conclusion drawn from the physical evidence. What a person wants to believe is irrelevant. Moreover, I do not understand how you have drawn any implications regarding what the individual wishes to believe about a specific deity.

[Zavien Doombringer]

The statement that humans evolved from "something similar" is a conclusion drawn from the physical evidence.

There isn't any evidence of humans being evolved from anything like this..

therefore your statement is based on whimsical ideas and theories. You live in a "what if" fantasy world.

Where is this conclusive evidence? Dr. Linkey couldn't even find the link!

[metmom]

"Tiktaalik blurs the boundary between fish and land-living animal both in terms of its anatomy and its way of life," said Neil Shubin,...

He can't get more specific than *blurs*? The statement that humans evolved form something similar is a pretty safe one for an evolutionist to make, very non-commital and certainly not new. There is nothing in the article, however, that states *This is it*. It sounds like wishful thinking on his part.