[muawiyah]

Wikipedia is not a reliable, trustworthy source. That's because anybody can go in there and write anything they want. I've done it myself.

[CarolinaGuitarman]

"Wikipedia is not a reliable, trustworthy source. That's because anybody can go in there and write anything they want. I've done it myself."

So? What makes something reliable? You don't believe in objective reality anyway. Maybe all definitions are correct; how would you know the difference?

[js1138]

Wikipedia is not a reliable, trustworthy source. That's because anybody can go in there and write anything they want. I've done it myself.

I'm sure there's a connection lurking in this.

[jec41]

Wikipedia is not a reliable, trustworthy source. That's because anybody can go in there and write anything they want. I've done it myself.

Well you could look it up yourself or read a science book but anything other than your opinion would be discounted. The definition of evolution was stated many years before Wikipedia and in fact I probably studied it before you were born. It has not changed even though you would change Wikipedia as a agenda to support your opinion.