Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: King Prout

No, scientists accept new models only through a process of attribiton where the old believers die off and are replaced with the new believers.


749 posted on 04/06/2006 8:57:31 AM PDT by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 725 | View Replies ]


To: muawiyah; js1138; VadeRetro; Ichneumon; Coyoteman
No, scientists accept new models only through a process of attribiton where the old believers die off and are replaced with the new believers.

"only" is a big word, kid. like all absolute qualifiers, it is one requiring but a single counterexample to refute.

I am not one of the big dogs on the history of science in the 20th century, so I cannot easily give you one clear example of a scientist accepting a new model after strongly supporting an old one. However: I know there have been not one but many such, and am quite certain one of the big dogs I have included as recipients of this note can easily provide names of such examples.

What I don't know is whether:
1. they will consider it worth doing, or
2. whether you are capable of accepting a factual rebuttal.

767 posted on 04/06/2006 9:24:29 AM PDT by King Prout (The UN 1967 Outer Space Treaty is bad for America and bad for humanity - DUMP IT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 749 | View Replies ]

To: muawiyah

ant you meant "attrition" not "attribution" when you typed "attribiton", yes?


768 posted on 04/06/2006 9:25:48 AM PDT by King Prout (The UN 1967 Outer Space Treaty is bad for America and bad for humanity - DUMP IT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 749 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson