To: William Terrell
Laws imply a law giver or maker.
This is a semantic argument, using a truth behind one definition of "law" to make a claim about a different definition. This is not a valid line of reasoning.
714 posted on
04/06/2006 7:51:52 AM PDT by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: Dimensio
So, law is the basis of truth?
Truth is an absolute, not a law... You can break a law, but you cannot break an absolute.
Truth is truth, for all things in all places in all time. Truth is the same absolute for everyone.
724 posted on
04/06/2006 8:18:44 AM PDT by
Zavien Doombringer
(The UN 1967 Outer Space Treaty is bad for America and bad for humanity - DUMP IT!)
To: Dimensio
Does order come of chaos by itself? Prove it.
738 posted on
04/06/2006 8:44:51 AM PDT by
William Terrell
(Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson