To: VadeRetro
Move the goalposts much? Actually I never move the goalposts. I don't have to since nobody has gotten near the end zone yet. Fish to amphibians to reptiles to egg laying mammals is still not a link from fish to man. There are still aquatic animals in this century that adapt to drought conditions by becoming more amphibious and I've yet to meet a human that lays eggs, much less hang from trees on its days off, unless you want to discuss the welfare class.
There is nothing in the whole Darwin *theory* to support the fish-to-man theory, no matter how many times they "move the goalposts."
380 posted on
04/05/2006 4:07:29 PM PDT by
PistolPaknMama
(Al-Queda can recruit on college campuses but the US military can't! --FReeper airborne)
To: PistolPaknMama
Fish to amphibians to reptiles to egg laying mammals is still not a link from fish to man.
However, that series, plus the links from egg-laying mammals to live-birth mammals, from small to larger mammals, from land-dwelling mammals to tree-climbing mammals with limbs that served a purpose beyond simply walking or running, to primate mammals to humans does create such a link.
384 posted on
04/05/2006 4:13:38 PM PDT by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: PistolPaknMama
Actually I never move the goalposts. I don't have to since nobody has gotten near the end zone yet. Fish to amphibians to reptiles to egg laying mammals is still not a link from fish to man. How dumb do you want to play this, or are you not playing? A line of fish became amphibians. A line of amphibians became reptiles. And so proceed as I said already in the post to which you want credit for responding but have thus far failed to address.
449 posted on
04/05/2006 5:56:57 PM PDT by
VadeRetro
(I have the updated "Your brain on creationism" on my homepage.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson