To: CarolinaGuitarman
You're really the only one concerned with so-called "objective reality".
The only way that concept becomes useful in discussion is if you are comparing metaphysical concepts with non-metaphysical concepts.
If you'd ever bothered to read any of my threads (rather than run off in a screamng rant) you'd noticed I use the terms "bounds" and "boundaries" ~ which are exceedingly useful in discussing speciation.
To: muawiyah
"You're really the only one concerned with so-called "objective reality"."
Yes, me and most other rational people.
"If you'd ever bothered to read any of my threads (rather than run off in a screamng rant) you'd noticed I use the terms "bounds" and "boundaries" ~ which are exceedingly useful in discussing speciation."
You are the one who ranted against the idea of objective reality existing. You are the one who hilariously said that it was communists and fascists who believed in objective reality and that Christians don't think the accounts in the bible are objectively true. When you said that the universe could be a thought in your mind, that's when I knew I wasn't dealing with a rational individual.
You HAVE been entertaining though. :)
1,194 posted on
04/07/2006 11:43:55 AM PDT by
CarolinaGuitarman
("There is grandeur in this view of life....")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson