[Principled]

I have faith in Jorgenson - but not an anonymous poster on an internet board. What I've seen myself indicates that Jogenson is not faulty - it is rather portions of different testimonies, letters, etc that are being taken out of context in order to assert something that Jorgenson is not asserting.

After all, why pick and choose sentences here and there from Jorgenson's words to attempt to construe an assertion rather than just getting the whole thing from Jorgenson?

Yes, the former chairman of Economics at harvard, the guy with the letters behind his name indicating that he is an expert - he far, far, far outweighs anyone on this forum, no matter how skilled at misrepresentation.

[Your Nightmare]

Yes, the former chairman of Economics at harvard, the guy with the letters behind his name indicating that he is an expert - he far, far, far outweighs anyone on this forum, no matter how skilled at misrepresentation.

I wasn't commenting on Jorgenson's believability, I was commenting on the AFT's. They are the ones who have (and continue to) misrepresent Jorgenson's work.