To: SampleMan
" ... let me be the first to say that I'm sure that everyone will be absolutely objective, collegial, and downright polite."
LOL!!!!!
When the evolutionists pile on that's when the thread deteriorates. They get down right NASTY.
I scanned the article. What the cowards have done is removed the word God and substituted the words Intelligent Design. The Intelligent Designer is the Judeo Christian God and yes, genuine, OBJECTIVE, science does support God, er Intelligent Design.
3 posted on
03/29/2006 8:00:07 PM PST by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) !)
To: nmh; SampleMan
...genuine, OBJECTIVE, science does support God, er Intelligent Design. Show me the creationist, err ID-ist explanation for this phenomenon:
the recurrent laryngeal nerve. post 339
Normal biology does in fact have an explanation.
To: nmh
What the cowards have done is removed the word God and substituted the words Intelligent Design. The Intelligent Designer is the Judeo Christian God... I agree, nmh. Whatever side you're on and however strongly you feel about it, Intelligent Design is creationism with a fresh coat of paint.
It is certainly true that we don't completely understand the way evolution works, but that doesn't mean that you can automatically conclude proof of God (which is impossible anyway, if you ask me).
34 posted on
03/29/2006 8:44:48 PM PST by
Starve The Beast
(I used to be disgusted, but now I try to be amused)
To: nmh
When the evolutionists pile on that's when the thread deteriorates. They get down right NASTY. It appears the first ad hominem goes to the anti-evolution crowd. Go figure.
91 posted on
03/30/2006 3:28:01 AM PST by
Junior
(Identical fecal matter, alternate diurnal period)
To: nmh
The Intelligent Designer is the Judeo Christian God and yes, genuine, OBJECTIVE, science does support God, er Intelligent Design.
141 posted on
03/30/2006 7:30:03 AM PST by
RightWingAtheist
(Creationism is to conservatism what Howard Dean is to liberalism)
To: nmh
What the cowards have done is removed the word God and substituted the words Intelligent Design.Do you mean to suggest that ID is religious, and not scientific after all? Do any other ID proponents challenge this?
166 posted on
03/30/2006 9:13:59 AM PST by
Condorman
(Prefer infinitely the company of those seeking the truth to those who believe they have found it.)
To: nmh
When the evolutionists pile on that's when the thread deteriorates. They get down right NASTY.
I scanned the article. What the cowards have done...
Hmmmm...Post #3, defensive statement followed by name-calling. Have you looked in the mirror lately?
197 posted on
03/30/2006 10:28:04 AM PST by
Wolfstar
(You can't tell me it all ends in a slow ride in a hearse...No, this can't be all there is...)
To: nmh
When the evolutionists pile on that's when the thread deteriorates. They get down right NASTY.These debates got nastier when the creationists started pushing to have ID taught in public schools as science.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson