Unsurprisingly I was right - no testable predictions are deduced from an assumption of ID. Thanks for posting even more evidence for my theory that ID isn't scientific.
Shouldn't you be out feeding Christians to lions? I'm curious though, what is the testable part of evolution? Have we tested that light has a finite limit?
I'm no ID expert, not even a proponent, but wouldn't the test be to attempt to break down the cell into working parts? Seems reasonable from the article.