Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: AntiGuv
You've got to turn it upside down, think owl, and use the thorax as a beak.

And, you are correct, they are scarcely "irreducible." Is that what was in he original post?
228 posted on 03/30/2006 11:30:41 AM PST by From many - one.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies ]


To: From many - one.; SampleMan
No, I just didn't phrase myself well (at all). Yes, in some cases they seem to mimic hawks or owls. What I meant is that they don't want to resemble the bird that they want to keep away, which is how I took the original comments (perhaps I read that wrong), but rather a predator of that bird (which may include other birds).

And yes, the original post was claiming that the moth eyespots are "irreducibly simple" in that a 'partial eyespot' allegedly wouldn't confer any advantage.

233 posted on 03/30/2006 11:39:26 AM PST by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson