[robertpaulsen]

"She was threatened by your attempt to urinate on her or worse, rape her and perhaps spread AIDS to her."

WHAT???

Geez, why do you add that she was threatened by my attempt to hit her with it! Well, obviously, you've now changed your argument from "She was harmed" to "She was threatened with harm".

No probem. If she was threatened with harm, then I agree she has a case. Now, was this threat real or imagined?

In the other thread that discussed the incident, the guy just stood there, exposed, saying and doing nothing. Where's the threat?

There is none, Zon. Admit it. In your little libertarian world, she couldn't prove harm or a threat of harm in a million years. This activity, like drug use, would be legal in your world.

And that's all I'm trying to point out.

[Mojave]

And what if the perp had been exposing himself to another happy pervert?

By libertarian theory, it would be the responsibilty of any unwilling bystanders to just look away and mind their own business. The statists!