but still you didn't answer my question! if the drug use dof an employee do not affect its productivity, why should he get fired or would need to find another job??
great post but still didn't answer my question! but i must admit it was not well formulated! why would an employer fire a drug users whose productivity is not affected? you seem to get stuck with the idea that a drug user's productivity is automatically reduced!
also the government is creating it's own black market by putting up those taxes! don't you think it is suspicious! it is something the mass as to show to the government, the majority doesn't want black market, so they should wake up! that excuse cannot hold with drugs as the health deterioration is showing up earlier than cigarets...with cigarets you are so hooked on it you cannot quit even if you have to smoke it through a hole! drugs legal and proper education made, users will see what's not good about it!
soagain why would you fire somebody who's on drug but bring more money than it costs??? the motive of a company is profit, it should stick to it!