[Hemingway's Ghost]

If you think you or your property have been damaged by a person's act of ingesting drugs -- perhaps while they were sitting in their home -- take them to court and try to convince an impartial jury that you were harmed and the extent of that harm so that you may gain restitution for your loss.

After seven-odd years of participating on FR WoD threads, I've yet so see a WoD-supporter answer this question . . .

[Zon]

If you think you or your property have been damaged by a person's act of ingesting drugs -- perhaps while they were sitting in their home -- take them to court and try to convince an impartial jury that you were harmed and the extent of that harm so that you may gain restitution for your loss.88

After seven-odd years of participating on FR WoD threads, I've yet so see a WoD-supporter answer this question . .

Nor have I. It separates the communitarians from the champions of individual rights.

[tpaine]

Carry_Okie: I AM in favor of heavy penalties for damages done to others while under the influence subject to due process of law. If you call that a police state, get a grip.
49

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


If you think you or your property have been damaged by a person's act of ingesting drugs -- perhaps while they were sitting in their home -- take them to court and try to convince an impartial jury that you were harmed and the extent of that harm so that you may gain restitution for your loss. 
88 Zon


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



I read an article on FR that concerned a guy flashing a girl.
Your solution to that incident would be that if the girl felt that she or her property was damaged by that flasher, that she should take him to court and try to convince an impartial jury that she was harmed and the extent of that harm so that she could gain restitution for her loss?
134 robertpaulsen


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



After seven-odd years of participating on FR WoD threads, I've yet so see a WoD-supporter answer this [Zon's]
question . . .
139 Hemingway's Ghost


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



Zon's question can't be answered by the warriors, so like paulsen they dance around pretending that our jury system [under constitutional rule of law] cannot cope with simply regulating the public aspects of morally repugnant behaviors..

These warriors insist that 'we the people' must ignore our own constitution in order to prohibit some types of property, and some types of behavior from ~society~. -- Thereby initiating a police state.

[robertpaulsen]

"After seven-odd years of participating on FR WoD threads, I've yet so see a WoD-supporter answer this question . . ."

Just as I have never seen anyone identify any government or society anywhere in the world in all of recorded history that restricted their laws to those that only involved harm to others.