[adam_az]

"Ooooh. Cannabis is harmless and you have a 1930 report which says so."

Another stupid jerky strawman red herring comment all rolled up in one - and you smoked it. Sucker.

There was a lot more than 1 study from 1930, but the only way you could counter the plethora of evidence was by mischaracterizing it.

You don't know truth, and you have no honor.

I've known pot smokers with both.

Using your addled logic, you should try smoking it.

[Lady Jag]

There was a lot more than 1 study from 1930, but the only way you could counter the plethora of evidence was by mischaracterizing it.

You don't know truth, and you have no honor.

Well said. All he really wants to do is argue and he has a misconception of the health of his ego, so he ends up looking the fool.

[robertpaulsen]

"There was a lot more than 1 study from 1930, but the only way you could counter the plethora of evidence was by mischaracterizing it."

Would you have included a 1930 study? I wouldn't have. But then again, I have principles.