Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: King Prout

Thank you for the compliment. I shluld also say that you are, by far, the most dispassionate of all the folk who have ever disagreed with me on the subject.

I am fully aware that my anecdotal statements are only one step up from useless. I am also aware that just not hitting is not enough to be a good parent, firm expectations and good role-modelling are right up there in importance. Along with a swarm of other things.

The innate characteristics I refer to, though, are anything but sentimental (those who know me would laugh hyseterically at the thoughtof me sentimental).

They are simply basic biology: any social mammal that is not accepted by its parent(s) is going to be food for something, possibly even mom. Most culture is acquired by imitation.

Designing a good piece of objective research in this area would be extraordinarily difficult, but I think it might be worthwhile.

Continued slow response warning. My heavy work season is just starting and I'm heading out soon for some outdoor project prep.


876 posted on 03/18/2006 6:32:09 AM PST by From many - one.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 872 | View Replies ]


To: From many - one.

doing experimental research on children is indeed (and should be) quite impossible.

tailoring non-experimental observational research (through very careful sample selection from among extant families) to yield the same conditions as a designed experimental regimen could work, but would be exceedingly difficult to pull off - uncontrolled variables would slip in, and most would not be readily identifiable.


878 posted on 03/18/2006 11:14:47 AM PST by King Prout (DOWN with the class-enemies at Google! LONG LIVE THE PEOPLE'S CUBE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 876 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson