Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: PatrickHenry; Coyoteman; JCEccles; EarnestWorm; Elsie; King Prout; js1138; DaveLoneRanger; ...
I haven't read much of this thread, but I did come across a discussion about this topic on Panda's Thumb, an excerpt of which is:

“But as usual the ‘victory’ of Intelligent Design was mostly smoke and mirrors and short lived as the OCR Exam Board released a clarification. Why is it that Intelligent Design can only be succesful in our ignorance? ...

Indeed, the brits are teaching the controversy and it does not include Intelligent Design and creationism as they are not scientific theories. In case of Intelligent Design I have argued that it is scientifically vacuous more than not scientific because it lacks much of anything relevant to determine if it is scientific...

The British Humanist Association wrote a letter to the Minister for Schools asking 'for a reply that clarified whether it is indeed the government’s view that creationism and ‘intelligent design’ are examples of scientific theories based on empirical evidence within the meaning of the national curriculum.'...

The minister Jacqui Smith responded to oral questions about Intelligent Design on Oct 31 2005:

Dr. Gibson: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many schools in England teach a course in which intelligent design forms a unit.

Jacqui Smith: Intelligent design does not form part of any programme of study in the national curriculum. In science pupils should be taught at Key Stage 4 “how scientific controversies can arise from different ways of interpreting empirical evidence [for example, Darwin’s theory of evolution]”. Although it is possible that intelligent design could be raised in this context, controversies need to be scientific in order to meet national curriculum requirements.

Intelligent design may be taught in religious education lessons as a religious interpretation of how the world was created. All religious education syllabuses are devised by local authorities, so statistics are not held centrally."

The entire article and thread may be read HERE

804 posted on 03/15/2006 12:52:12 PM PST by Always Learning
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 753 | View Replies ]


To: Always Learning

nice!


805 posted on 03/15/2006 2:01:17 PM PST by King Prout (DOWN with the class-enemies at Google! LONG LIVE THE PEOPLE'S CUBE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 804 | View Replies ]

To: Always Learning

Most excellent.

I particularly liked this:

"...Although it is possible that intelligent design could be raised in this context, controversies need to be scientific in order to meet national curriculum requirements..."


808 posted on 03/15/2006 2:19:37 PM PST by From many - one.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 804 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson