What is YOUR problem with freedom of though?
I will assume you meant "thought", not "though".
I have no problem with freedom of thought do I? What did I say in my post that says otherwise. I said I don't believe that ID is science. Scientists do not look for "outside" intelligence when devising theories do they?
For example, electromagnetic wave theory doesn't say that some intelligence is responsible for oscillatory disturbances right? No science uses an "intelligence" to answer what is going on in nature.
Now where did I say I am against freedom of thought. Did I say "Suppress the masses... all must think like ME...." No... I simply made a statement, that I did not believe ID is science and stated why.
Now if you want to refute that, and say ID is.. well you are more than welcome to and you may have some good points to your argument. But never... ever... say I am against freedom of thought. You have the freedom to believe any old thing you want... as do I.