To: PatrickHenry
Your concept that "macro evolution" happens only in mass group stages is is unreasonable. If it were happening it would happen in different stages in different people groups, if this were fact then species dwelling in different environmental regions would have evolved into different species. However instead, you site "human pre species" living on several different continents, if it were so, then they would have evolved into vastly different specimen, not entirely all human. Also if evolution were happening, it should then still be happening in every stage. This would mean that there would still be "monkeys evolving into apes", as well as "apes evolving into men" meaning the transitional species would be living, breathing in existence. They're not there, I don't look around and see a "half man, half ape", nor other transitions between existing species. If evolution were such a well supported theory, then why prey tell is it that the more evidence presented me about evo, the less I believe it?
274 posted on
03/10/2006 7:24:27 PM PST by
whispering out loud
(the bible is either 100% true, or in it's very nature it is 100% a lie)
To: whispering out loud
If evolution were such a well supported theory, then why prey tell is it that the more evidence presented me about evo, the less I believe it?Must...not...comment...step...away...from...the...keyboard... :-)
(Off to dinner.)
278 posted on
03/10/2006 7:28:34 PM PST by
jennyp
(WHAT I'M READING NOW: Life and Solitude in Easter Island by Verdugo-Binimelis)
To: whispering out loud
If evolution were such a well supported theory ... It is.
... then why prey tell is it that the more evidence presented me about evo, the less I believe it?
I'm not qualified to give an opinion on that.
280 posted on
03/10/2006 7:28:55 PM PST by
PatrickHenry
(Virtual Ignore for trolls, lunatics, dotards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
To: whispering out loud
"This would mean that there would still be "monkeys evolving into apes", as well as "apes evolving into men" meaning the transitional species would be living, breathing in existence. They're not there, I don't look around and see a "half man, half ape", nor other transitions between existing species. If evolution were such a well supported theory, then why prey tell is it that the more evidence presented me about evo, the less I believe it?"
You have evolution all wrong. Evolution is not a constant point A to point B process. There were many half men half apes, but they were all killed off, because our species was smarter than them. As short as 100,000 years ago there was more than one species of human. Even within our species we have different races, that if seperated for thousands upon thousands of years would become seperate species. White people are white because humans with dark skin couldn't reproduce well enough in northern climates, where there isn't as much sun.
Now give me one piece of evidence, one, that suggests god even exists. No quoting bibles, I want evidence god exists.
To: whispering out loud
If evolution were such a well supported theory, then why prey tell is it that the more evidence presented me about evo, the less I believe it? Maybe you're not comfortable with having lots of evidence? A stray thought from the could-be-a-clue-in-there-somewhere department: you used "prey" instead of "pray."
349 posted on
03/11/2006 5:45:51 AM PST by
VadeRetro
(I have the updated "Your brain on creationism" on my homepage.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson