OK, I get it now. You believe CAIR's Hooper over Paul Sperry. And you think UAE has freedom of religion and freedom of the press. Inconvenient facts be damned.
This post of yours proves your first post was incorrect. You may try to gloss over the facts presented, even try to rebut them with pro-Muslim "facts". But the facts remain.
I'm through with you. Buh bye.
No, I would not accept Hooper's or Sperry's opinion. They both have a agenda. Sperry has a opinion but has not supported it with facts. Hooper denied a accusation by Sperry. Sperry has not provided any facts to support any accusation.
Posted below is a Sperry article and a example of his opinion. Facts need not get in the way.
"We are in a world of official lies as a method of government."
"Or, you can continue to be a proud member of the Coalition of the Willing to Believe White House Propaganda about Iraq. And you can go right on standing fast with Bush and his talk radio lapdogs.
But know that you are standing on the wrong side of truth and history – a place where the entire GOP may find itself stuck for many years if it doesn’t soon divest itself from Bush and his Iraq debacle."
I don't think nor would most think that our method of government is nothing but all official lies, but Sperry does and he purports the opinion without a proof or fact of one official lie. Our method of government is by the constitution. Is it all a lie?
This post of yours proves your first post was incorrect. You may try to gloss over the facts presented, even try to rebut them with pro-Muslim "facts". But the facts remain.
Your posted opinion that opinions are facts is noted. How ever it is but your own opinion.