Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: antaresequity

I think maybe we need to ask what he knows that we don't know.

I am on record against this. But who the heck am I and what do I know about this on anything other than an appearance level?

Nothing.

So my next question is—here is a guy whose every waking breath is spent in protecting the American people within the confines of the law and practical application...and he is absolutely intent on making this happen.

Why?

It would be an easy enough thing to back off on. He believes in this. There has to be a reason, something broader that is not known.


90 posted on 02/21/2006 12:42:05 PM PST by pollyannaish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: pollyannaish
He believes in this. There has to be a reason, something broader that is not known.

What, like the same reason he's against securing the border? If this story is true then I'm demanding a search of his head for 6's.

153 posted on 02/21/2006 12:48:30 PM PST by mtbopfuyn (Legality does not dictate morality... Lavin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

To: pollyannaish
His firmness on this astounds me, especially in the face of nearly unanimous opposition from both sides of the aisle and the fact that he's never before vetoed any legislation, not even the abominable McCain-Finegold monstrosity. That leads me to think, like you, that there's something deeply serious and entirely confidential going on here. Could it have to do with some kind of surprise military action planned against Iran???
247 posted on 02/21/2006 12:56:06 PM PST by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

To: pollyannaish

"It would be an easy enough thing to back off on. He believes in this. There has to be a reason, something broader that is not known."

Fact: GWB giggles "Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton"
Fact: GHWB has been getting quite chummy with one B. Clinton.
Fact: GWB supports a move that is seemingly counter productive to U.S. safety concerns, and puts out nothing other than "support". Threatens to excersize his veto power for the FIRST time, since he has taken office.
Fact: One Hillary Clinton, who has been moving towards being "tough on security", is rallying support to stop the sale of port management services to the UAE.

Those are facts.


364 posted on 02/21/2006 1:07:00 PM PST by brownsfan (It's not a war on terror... it's a war with islam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

To: pollyannaish
He believes in this. There has to be a reason, something broader that is not known.

It's part of the G W Bush Secure Borders & No Amnesty Initiative.

576 posted on 02/21/2006 1:30:06 PM PST by Pelham ("Borders? We don' need no stinking borders!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson