To: Brian Mosely
57 posted on
02/21/2006 12:39:04 PM PST by
antaresequity
(PUSH 1 FOR ENGLISH, PUSH 2 TO BE DEPORTED)
To: antaresequity
Isn't it ironic that the socalled imperial president has never vetoed a single bill? Impish, more like.
114 posted on
02/21/2006 12:44:26 PM PST by
Huck
(Roe/Kelo: You have a right to privacy IN your bedroom; you just don't have a right TO your bedroom.)
To: antaresequity
Pres. Bush is certainly no Reagan. Of course Reagan had to deal with a Dem. HOR.
120 posted on
02/21/2006 12:44:48 PM PST by
rollo tomasi
(Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
To: antaresequity
And none of the Republican Presidents ever had a Republican controlled congress.
Why would a Republican veto his own Party's spending bills?
To: antaresequity
So 50-50 on using the veto and being a "Great" President....
1,273 posted on
02/21/2006 3:49:25 PM PST by
AmericanDave
(More COWBELL....................)
To: antaresequity
Your chart is a little misleading, look at the date at the bottom.
2,092 posted on
02/21/2006 8:21:17 PM PST by
BigSkyFreeper
(Proud to be a cotton-pickin' Republican on the GOP Plantation)
To: antaresequity
Your veto stats in post 57 are useless.
Basically, if the prez and congress are held by the same party, the veto is used the least (kennedy, carter, bush)
When the control is split, that is when the veto is used most. It is as simple as that.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
