To: Lazamataz
One DOES NOT HAND OVER IMPORTANT PORTS, VIOLATING ONE'S NATIONAL SECURITY to a country to keep them engaged. the ports were already run by the British
To: Swordfished
the ports were already run by the BritishFirst I heard of that; I don't like that either.
However, the British at least are not an Islamic country that openly harbors extremist Muslims.
Yet.
313 posted on
02/21/2006 1:01:42 PM PST by
Lazamataz
(Islam is a fatal disease that must be eradicated from the body Earth.)
To: Swordfished
the ports were already run by the British
...who didn't kill 3,000 people. Do you see a difference? Or are you just of muslim descent and find this personally offensive? nothing personal in this question.
332 posted on
02/21/2006 1:03:41 PM PST by
Tulsa Ramjet
("If not now, when")
To: Swordfished
the ports were already run by the British You bet! And BURNED DC in 1812 the Schmucks!
569 posted on
02/21/2006 1:29:17 PM PST by
DJ MacWoW
(If you think you know what's coming next....You don't know Jack.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson