Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: sinkspur

it might be time for them to expand into a new business.
after all, if you are to have us believe that "nothing will change" after the acquisition by the UAE, that "the same americans will be working the ports as were before" - then why wouldn't Halliburton be willing to take on a new enterprise - after all, nothing will change you claim, there are no security issues since that is done by DHS, so it should be easy for Halliburton to step in. all they have to do is change a few signs, and they will have an instantly profitable business.

there has to be some fundamental reason why a state owned UAE company, is so eager to acquire port operations. at from what I understand, they are paying a market premium for it.

but of course, god forbid I should be suspicions, it must be because I'm a racist.


1,950 posted on 02/21/2006 7:28:07 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1939 | View Replies ]


To: oceanview
Well now, oceanview, if Halliburton is so well situated to run these six ports then why didn't Halliburton submit a competitive bid?

We are talking about the merits of free enterprise. If someone can make a case for the UAE acquisition being a danger
to the security of the United States of America that's different.

But I haven't heard a solid case made yet.
2,014 posted on 02/21/2006 7:48:28 PM PST by the final gentleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1950 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson