I'm going to require evidence here. I was opposed to Miers because the evidence tended to prove she would be incompetent on the Supreme Court. In a similar fashion, I would like to weigh some evidence here. If the evidence is there, it ought to be easy to come up with. My own google search persuades me only that this is a straightforward business deal that doesn't change personnel or security measures substantially, if at all. But maybe I'm missing something.
Exactly how does this deal compromise US security? Please be as specific as you can.