"I don't call them liars for that. I call creationists liars when they make claims that are very easily and demonstrably false to anyone -- regardless of whether or not they are a creationist -- who is objective. In nmh's case, I have pointed out that nmh denied making comment about Antony Flew despite a prior post where he (or she) did exactly that."
Again that is FALSE.
I'd NEVER HEARD OF THE guy.
Lying about it doesn't make it true.
I'd NEVER HEARD OF THE guy.
Okay, perhaps I should stop being so accusatory. You need to understand that there is significant evidence, not only to me but to others, that you have, in fact, made statements about the person but if you could explain the misunderstanding then perhaps we could end this hostility. My belief to the contrary lies in what appears to me to be a discrepancy in your posting history, but perhaps you could clear it up for me so that, better educated, I will stop lobbing (as you claim) false accusations..
To whom were you referring when you said "another one" in
this post? In that same discussion, you used the pronoun "he" in
this post with the phrase "he rejects it". To whom did the pronoun "he" refer? Note that I have to conclude that "he" refers specifically to someone in the linked article, as the pronoun is prefaced with "Read the article." While the linked article is no longer available, I can reference a copy of the article stored elsewhere if you need it for reference. Check
here.
Note that the article to which the discussion pertained was about philospher Antony Flew. Now, I did not see you referencing any other names, and your first post, with the "another one" reference, was directly to the original article. As such, I assumed that you were referring to Antony Flew. If there was ambiguity such that I was mistaken, please explain to me to whom you were referring, exactly, and I will make a full apology for calling you a liar.