"There is not a shred of evidence that supports the queer notion of life out of nothing, and the fossil/geologic evidence clearly concurrs with the biblical description of the flood. More importantly, God's inerrant word clearly states that evolution did not happen, and the two are mutually exclusive.
Life out of nothing? How about life out of pre-life. How about life out of self-replicating chemicals. How about life out of anything but nothing.
The global flood has been disproved so many times as to be funny. Only the most biased, closed minded person would insist that the scientific evidence supports a global flood. (didn't I sound just like a creationist there?)
If you want to claim the Bible inerrant then go ahead and claim existence is based on miracles, but don't try to make creationism a science, it doesn't work and its feeble attempts to make the data fit the Bible are simply hilarious.
I find it interesting that creationists are not willing to accept abiogenesis (which would follow known physical laws), but are willing to not only accept, but base their living philosophy on, magic.
Abiogenesis is a pipe dream that follows nothing but imagination.
"but are willing to not only accept, but base their living philosophy on, magic"
An opinion based in ignorance. Biblical assertions have the strong proof behind them of fulfilled prophecy, and the statistical science that is documented in "The Bible Code Bombshell." The fact that you are too pig-headed to even read that powerful scientific evidence limits the value of your opinion severely.
What known physical laws would explain abiogenesis? And who said that creationists base their philosophy for living on magic? I presume you can support that second statement with some references.