Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Jo Nuvark
A literal interpretation of a 6 day creation may sound lidicrous, but then so does evolution. Teach both and let the students make their own choice. What's the harm?

Students would then have a poor understanding of what science is.
419 posted on 02/20/2006 1:50:32 PM PST by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 411 | View Replies ]


To: Dimensio

[...Students would then have a poor understanding of what science is...]

Don't start yelling until you finish reading. I don't think evolution is good science. No, I'm not a scientist, but that doesn't mean I can't put two and two together.

In grade school, I went to a museum and saw an exhibit with a tooth or jawbone and then there was this long line of human/ape looking creatures up to "modern man". Except for the tooth, on each one it said "Artists Concept".

Even as a grade schooler, I could see there was a huge gap in evidence filled in with wishful thinking and artistic imagination.

I don't have to PROVE God. He proves Himself. Evolution is another story.


473 posted on 02/20/2006 2:22:18 PM PST by Jo Nuvark ((Those who bless Israel will be blessed, those who curse Israel will be cursed. Gen 12:3))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 419 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson