Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Right Wing Professor
Dini reworked his criteria so that it could not be read as requiring a "belief" in evolution to avoid running afoul of the free exercise clause so that he might continue to remain on the public payroll.

His reworking of the wording is a tacit admission that he was in deep doodoo if the case went to the courts.

296 posted on 02/20/2006 12:06:46 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies ]


To: jwalsh07
Dini reworked his criteria so that it could not be read as requiring a "belief" in evolution to avoid running afoul of the free exercise clause so that he might continue to remain on the public payroll.

Oh, but I thought you disapproved of the Federal Courts being brought into it? Doesn't Dini, as part of his right to free speech, have the right to decide who he writes letters of recommendation for? And isn't the intervention of the federal government, to force someone to write a letter recommending someone, a far more egregious intrusion than a federal government preventing a school broad from adopting a certain curriculum?

309 posted on 02/20/2006 12:15:47 PM PST by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson