His reworking of the wording is a tacit admission that he was in deep doodoo if the case went to the courts.
Oh, but I thought you disapproved of the Federal Courts being brought into it? Doesn't Dini, as part of his right to free speech, have the right to decide who he writes letters of recommendation for? And isn't the intervention of the federal government, to force someone to write a letter recommending someone, a far more egregious intrusion than a federal government preventing a school broad from adopting a certain curriculum?