On the other hand you have to understand that what you propose is not what this conflict is about. As far as most scientists are concerned you can teach in a theology/philosophy class whatever you want as long as you don't claim it is science.
But this is not what many creationsts are satisfied with. They want to pass off their theological opposition to evolution, geology, astronomy, radiology, etc. as equally valid as mainstream science.
Which, of course, it is not.
The fact remains, however, that while evolution should cover the gradual changes of a species, it should not try to explain the origins of life.
If science is going to operate under the assumption that only what is provable IS science, it cannot prove that life originated by 'accident'.