I guess you find it boring to be asked to back up your claims. In "I'm a devout Christian" world presumably it's enough just to have an emotional feeling that your beliefs are true. No need for any evidence.
So, for the rest of us who like some evidence when extraordinary allegations are made, when are you going to produce some backup about early evolutionary theorists leaping at evolutionary theory because they liked its sexual and moral implications? Or did you just make that claim up?
I am speaking to the implications, my dear friend, and this is something which evolutionists routinely ignore. Teach a kid that they have evolved from apes, and you are surprised when they go shooting at school.
And, even if this new fabricated claim of yours were true, it would have exactly what to do with whether evolution is true or false? Your argument is the worst kind of special pleading against an idea because you dislike its perceived emotional implications. This is a conservative forum, where we decide by reason, not emotion.