Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: donh

"I'd like references from the vast number of scientists who think science rules out the existence of metaphysical explanations of things--which is what philosophical naturalism, not science, assumes."

?Que? I think I might risk misunderstanding what you mean here; which assumptions to which do you mean?


2,279 posted on 03/04/2006 2:44:43 PM PST by gobucks (Blissful Marriage: A result of a worldly husband's transformation into the Word's wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2275 | View Replies ]


To: gobucks
?Que? I think I might risk misunderstanding what you mean here; which assumptions to which do you mean?

Than I think you butted into the conversation without knowing what it was about. Trace backwards to the point in this conversation to where you responded to what I was saying to someone else about philosophical naturalism.

2,284 posted on 03/04/2006 4:21:07 PM PST by donh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2279 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson