Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Ken H; donh
Sounds like a slice of humble pi is in order:)

After review the actual bill it is clear that what Donh said was simply not true. Indiana did not try to redefine the formula to pi=3. That was a false statement. What Indiana tried to do was to codify a new formula for determining the area of a circle. There was no attempt to legislate the I Kings 7:23.

Don had it half right, so I can't accuse him of being a "liar" but he made an error.

1,829 posted on 02/23/2006 7:06:19 PM PST by P-Marlowe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1828 | View Replies ]


To: P-Marlowe; donh
" Don had it half right, so I can't accuse him of being a "liar" but he made an error."

You also had it half right/half wrong too. You wouldn't have made that mistake if you had read that last paragraph from the link you provided, where the Indiana bill was mentioned. It seems there is enough blame to go around. We all have pi on our faces. :)
1,831 posted on 02/23/2006 7:15:50 PM PST by CarolinaGuitarman ("There is grandeur in this view of life...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1829 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson