Forgive me. I was sloppy with my use of the word "miracle." I was using the term in the sense of a violation of the laws of physics and/or chemistry.
Certainly, I agree that God sustains the universe and its laws every instant of every day, and that in and of itself is miraculous.
Thus, when I say natural processes, I mean processes governed chemistry and phyiscs, and that involve no violation of their laws.
I have no problem with science per se being concerned with the "non-miraculous." The division of the world into the "natural and supernatural" as though the natural world just chugs along on its own is a product of rationalism, not science. I believe that the majesty of God is exercised (in fact, I believe it is DEMANDED) by the complexity and order of the universe. This was the world of some of the greatest scientific minds the world has ever known.
I object to scientists attempting to do a bait and switch and talk about issues outside their domeain and call it "science."
Please see my response to Thatcherite for a slightly more treanchant statement of that point.