To: Dane
I guess the utter hypocrisy of there being no outrage over the part-Saudi, Brit and American owned Fox News, but complete nut-job outrage over this port deal between a Dubai company along with a Danish partner to buy a British company that works in the U.S. will go unnoticed?
138 posted on
02/19/2006 6:45:56 PM PST by
Pukin Dog
(Sans Reproache)
To: Pukin Dog
I guess the utter hypocrisy of there being no outrage over the part-Saudi, Brit and American owned Fox News, but complete nut-job outrage over this port deal between a Dubai company along with a Danish partner to buy a British company that works in the U.S. will go unnoticed? And what about Michelle Malkin. She always has her mug on the part saudi owned Fox News.
149 posted on
02/19/2006 6:56:14 PM PST by
Dane
( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
To: Pukin Dog
I guess the utter hypocrisy of there being no outrage over the part-Saudi, Brit and American owned Fox News, but complete nut-job outrage over this port deal between a Dubai company along with a Danish partner to buy a British company that works in the U.S. will go unnoticed?
Your example is a joke. Saudi Arabia's ruler owns 5% of the shares in Newscorp. Saudi Arabia does not own Fox News. Plus Fox News is not responsible for managing every major port on the east coast. I am also not aware of this Danish partner you refer to. They are a small part of the equation if they exist because DP World is a huge company that does not need a partner to buy this British company
The people who are supporting this deal have terrible judgment. Chertoff and Rice are incompetent.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson